Home
Contact Us
Advanced Search
Mamblog
Categories
GAY PRIDE LINKS!
Favorite Videos
News
Current Events
Entertainment
Events
Fashion & Style
Health/Fitness
Home/Family
Interviews
Reviews
Sports
Vacation/Travel
Obituaries
TLA Videos & Books

Search for a Movie at TLA

More News feeds

Home arrow Home/Family arrow Gay Marriage arrow Gay Marriage arrow Sexuality and Gender Law Clinic Files Amicus Brief in U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals Challenging Florida’s Marriage Restrictions on Gay Couples
Sexuality and Gender Law Clinic Files Amicus Brief in U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals Challenging Florida’s Marriage Restrictions on Gay Couples PDF Print E-mail
Dec 19, 2014 at 03:38 PM

Florida marriage laws violate the constitutional rights of lesbians and gay men to marry the person of their choice and to have that marriage recognized, Columbia Law School’s Sexuality and Gender Law Clinic argues in an amicus brief filed today with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit.

In the brief filed in a pair of consolidated cases, Brenner v. Armstrong and Grimsley v. Armstrong, Columbia Law School Professor Suzanne B. Goldberg argues that the U.S. Constitution’s due process and equal protection guarantee have long been understood to protect against government interference in fundamental personal decision making, including the choice of one’s spouse. In fact, Florida imposes few restrictions on the choices of married couples but nevertheless prohibits people from choosing a spouse of the same sex.
 
“On the whole, Florida’s marriage laws impose few restrictions on adults’ choice of marital partners and on the recognition of valid marriages.  Yet, by contrast, Florida imposes a singular, categorical, and constitutionally impermissible burden on lesbians and gay men who seek to exercise their fundamental right to marry their chosen partner and to have that marriage recognized,” writes Goldberg.
 
Goldberg’s clinic, founded in 2006, has filed amicus briefs in numerous cases challenging state bans on marriage rights for same-sex couples in the wake of the 2013 U.S. v. Windsor decision striking down a provision of the federal Defense of Marriage Act barring recognition of same-sex couples’ marriages.
 
“At this point, the majority of states allow same-sex couples to marry, which reinforces that Florida’s ban is not only unconstitutional but also out of step with the nation’s growing realization that denying marriage rights in this way is anti-American,” said Goldberg.  “Florida’s ban also causes direct and immediate harm to Florida families, who are treated as legal strangers in the eyes of the law,” she added.
 
Columbia Law School Sexuality and Gender Law Clinic students Lucas Qijing Fu ’15 and Julia Maddera ’16 assisted with research for and preparation of the brief.
# # #
Columbia Law School, founded in 1858, stands at the forefront of legal education and of the law in a global society. Columbia Law School combines traditional strengths in corporate law and financial regulation, international and comparative law, property, contracts, constitutional law, and administrative law with pioneering work in intellectual property, digital technology, tax law and policy, national security, human rights, sexuality and gender, and environmental law.

User Comments

Please login or register to add comments

GIANTmicrobes

Naming Contests

special massages, meetings, women, girls, new relationships, new encounters, new friends, new loves
Agen Sbobet Indolucky7
Free shipping on orders over $15 at Cellularfactory.com

Save 5% Off, 10% Off Orders of $75 at Petfood.com
tel:18005867831