Contact Us
Advanced Search
Favorite Videos
Current Events
Fashion & Style
TLA Videos & Books

Search for a Movie at TLA

Home arrow News arrow National News arrow news arrow Speaker Boehner Ignoring Public Will by Defending DOMA
Speaker Boehner Ignoring Public Will by Defending DOMA PDF Print E-mail
Mar 08, 2011 at 12:44 PM

Seven Important Questions Republicans Leaders Need to Answer

WASHINGTON – Speaker John Boehner and House Republicans leaders are expected to take action as early as tomorrow to defend Section 3 of the discriminatory Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in federal court. With a Friday filing deadline looming in two lawsuits, unanswered questions continue to dog Republican leaders.

The Republican effort is clearly at odds with the priorities of the American public. According to a February FOX News survey, “reducing unemployment” and “reducing the budget deficit” are the top priorities of Americans; social issues were not even listed. House Republican leaders also seem to be on the wrong side of history. Last week, the Pew Research Center released a nonpartisan pollindicating 45 percent of people (and 51 percent of independents) supported allowing gay and lesbian couples to marry. Just two years earlier, the same poll found that 35 percent (and 37 percent of independents) supported marriage equality, a 10 point jump in just 24 months.

“A ten-point jump in about two years is unheard of on an important social issue,” said Joe Solmonese, president of the Human Rights Campaign. “This jump clearly reflects the innate fairness of the American public and is proof that they are evolving toward an understanding that all Americans deserve the freedom to marry the person they love. It’s just mind-blogging that Republican leaders would so misread the tea leaves in their urgent effort to score cheap and temporary political points.”

Last week, House Republican leaders announced they would intervene and defend DOMA following the Obama Administration’s decision to no longer defend Section 3 of the statute in federal court. Speaker Boehner is convening the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG) to take formal action to intervene in the cases, and with a Friday deadline looming in cases filed in New York State and Connecticut, the BLAG could meet as early as tomorrow.

A number of important questions remain unanswered by House Republican Leaders:

There are as many as nine lawsuits in federal court challenging the constitutionality of Section 3 of DOMA. Will House Republicans intervene in all of these lawsuits?

Who will represent House Republicans in court? Will the House hire outside private counsel to defend the cases? If pro-bono legal counsel will be asked to represent the House, who will that be? Will a conflict and ethics check be conducted? Will the BLAG be consulted on strategic decisions related to the litigation?

How much taxpayer money will this all cost?

What will the House argue in defending DOMA? Will they go back to Congress’s 1996 arguments for passing the law – that it is necessary because marriage equality is “a radical, untested and inherently flawed social experiment” and contrary to the “moral conviction that heterosexuality better comports with traditional (especially Judeo-Christian) morality”?

The Justice Department stopped defending DOMA because they concluded that laws that discriminate based on sexual orientation should receive a higher level of scrutiny by courts. Will the House Republican leaders disagree? If so, will they argue that gays and lesbians have not suffered a long history of discrimination? That sexual orientation is somehow relevant to an individual’s ability to contribute to society, when they have four openly-gay colleagues? That gays and lesbians can change their sexual orientation, a position at odds with every major psychological organization? That gays and lesbians are politically powerful, ironically in defending a law passed by Congress specifically to disadvantage them?

Do they think they’ll win, especially given that in two DOMA-related cases in Massachusetts, a federal judge appointed by President Nixon has already found Section 3 of DOMA to be unconstitutional even under the lowest level of scrutiny that gives great deference to the legislature?

Apart from these cases, will Republican House leadership do anything to address the inequalities that lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people face?

The Human Rights Campaign is America’s largest civil rights organization working to achieve lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender equality. By inspiring and engaging all Americans, HRC strives to end discrimination against LGBT citizens and realize a nation that achieves fundamental fairness and equality for all.

User Comments

Please login or register to add comments

special massages, meetings, women, girls, new relationships, new encounters, new friends, new loves
Agen Sbobet Indolucky7

Save 5% Off, 10% Off Orders of $75 at Petfood.com